Make your engineering team measurably faster.

See your true velocity, find what's slowing you down, and know exactly what it costs, so engineering, leadership, and finance are working from the same numbers.

codiedev
EngagementVelocityFinanceAdoptionAlerts
Lead time · start → merge
2.4h
median
AI cost / merge
$4.49
8-wk avg
Sessions / merge
1.5
avg to ship
Sessions per day
Distinct AI sessions across the team
Last 9 weeks
Recent activity

Most teams have the tools. Almost none have the visibility.

Without it, adoption looks like impact, bottlenecks stay hidden, and progress is a guess. CodieDev closes that gap, guiding the transition to AI-first development, then turning every session into the data, visibility, and insight your team needs to keep accelerating.

OverviewVelocityFinanceAdoption
Lead time
36h
start → merge
Merges / wk
680
▲ 31% vs prior
Sessions / merge
1.5
avg to ship
AI cost / merge
$4.49
8-wk avg
AI spend / wk
$3,053
▲ 18% vs prior
Velocity & cost
Merges shipped per week against AI spend per merge.
Last 9 weeks
Merges / week AI cost / merge ($)

One full view of the software development lifecycle.

Your code, your tickets, and your AI coding tools each tell part of the story, in separate systems that never line up. CodieDev brings those siloed streams together into a single, connected view, so technical leadership and finance work from the same picture: how work moves from plan to merge, where it stalls, and what it costs along the way.

Your repos
GitHub / GitLab
What shipped: commits, pull requests, merges, and review flow.
Your project tracker
Jira / Linear
What was planned: scope, estimates, and where work actually lands.
Your AI coding tools
Claude Code, Codex, Gemini
How it got built: the AI layer behind every change.
codiedev
Unified dashboard

See your whole engineering org, and exactly where to accelerate.

One dashboard for the entire team's velocity, not a wall of vanity metrics. Understand how fast work actually ships, where the hours really go, and what's slowing you down, so you can fix the bottleneck instead of guessing at it, and watch the team get faster over time.

Real velocity. Lead time from start-coding to merge, sessions per merge, and where time is spent (coding vs. review wait) so you manage the actual constraint.

Bottlenecks, surfaced. Watch the review backlog form before it bites, see which repos are slowest, and catch the moment opened work starts outrunning merged work.

Adoption progress you can act on. Track how the team is taking up AI: power users vs. stuck engineers, steering quality, and a real-time alert the moment a developer is blocked by a rate limit.

Predictability. Re-anchor estimates to where work lands now, with ship-time by percentile instead of stale story points.

VelocityTrendsTeam
Human vs. AI backlog growth
When opened outruns merged, the review backlog grows: a bottleneck forming.
6 months
PRs opened (human) Reviewed & merged PRs opened (AI)

See how the work actually happens, not just what ships.

For the first time, the how behind your team's work is visible. CodieDev turns every AI coding session into a readable story: the problem, the approach, the tools used, and the lessons learned, tied to the engineer and the ticket. The reasoning that used to live invisibly in one person's head becomes shared knowledge the whole team can learn from.

Sessions
A. Rivera
9-day streakHeavy user
204
Sessions · 30d
87 ▲44
Last 7d · vs prior
Claude Code
Primary CLI
204 substantial Last 30d
Recent sessions1–3 of 25
Mapped LegacyTimestamp usage across 15 billing controllers for phase-2 cleanup1d ago
billing-svc · Large refactors are split into phases; memory files track which phase shipped what so follow-up tickets know the baseline.
Scoped constraints for BILL-475 timestamp migration1d ago
billing-svc · When scoping a large refactor, member-usage counts can be inflated by same-named members on other types; cross-check…
Reviewed per-tenant enrollment model and cache-refresh hooks2d ago
core-api · When planning CRUD endpoints, load project memory files early to surface gotchas like cache-refresh hooks.
Sessions
A. Rivera · 1d ago · Claude Code
Mapped LegacyTimestamp usage across 15 billing controllers for phase-2 cleanup

Grepped patterns, inspected method signatures, and confirmed downstream parameter types to plan boundary replacements for BILL-475.

Problem

Memory file confirms LegacyTimestamp cleanup is a phased effort; BILL-475 is a follow-up phase.

What happened
  1. Fetched ticket BILL-475 via mcp__tracker__getIssue
  2. Read memory file for prior BILL-460 LegacyTimestamp context
  3. Grep found 15 controller files containing LegacyTimestamp references
  4. Created and switched to branch feature/BILL-475
Learnings

Large refactors are split into phases; memory files track which phase shipped what, so follow-up tickets always know the baseline.

← Prev 1 of 25 Next →

Individual and team view.

Drill into one engineer's sessions or zoom out to the whole team's activity in a single place, so you always know who is working on what.

Patterns worth copying.

See how your most effective engineers approach problems, then turn their habits into team standards the rest of the org can follow.

Readable, not raw.

Every session is summarized in plain language: the problem, what happened, and what was learned, so insight takes seconds, not log-diving.

Know the ROI of your engineering org, and manage its fastest-growing cost.

As your team accelerates with AI, a new variable enters the budget: AI cost, climbing quickly and largely untracked. CodieDev gives you the full economics, so you can calculate return, control spend, and forecast with confidence.

Cost per unit of output. See the true cost to ship, per merge or per feature, trending over time, not a lump-sum bill.

Cost attribution. Break spend down by feature and by type of work (building, fixing, investigating, refactoring) so you know where the money actually goes.

Model optimization. See what the same work would cost across different AI models, and get guidance to switch or blend models to cut spend, with no vendor lock-in.

ROI & forecasting. Compare AI spend against engineering labor cost, calculate return on the investment, and forecast future spend on real usage data.

Waste, eliminated. Spot spend on work that never shipped, and recover it.

FinanceModelsRepos
AI cost per merge
Token spend per shipped merge
8 weeks
$4.49/ merge
Same tokens on other models · per merge
Gemini 2.5 Pro$1.78
GPT-5.3-Codex$2.50
Claude Sonnet 4.648% in use$2.69
Claude Opus 4.852% in use$4.49
GPT-5.5 Pro$32.22
Illustrative: switch or blend models to cut cost.
Cost by repo
core-api$487
web-app$96
billing-svc$78
search-svc$41

A flywheel for a faster engineering org, not a one-time report.

Transformation

Not AI-first yet? We bridge the gap and certify your team's capability. (Skip if you're already there.)

Connect

Link GitHub/GitLab, Jira/Linear, and your AI coding tools. No rip-and-replace.

Measure

One view of velocity, bottlenecks, adoption progress, and cost.

Improve

Act on the insights, ship faster, then measure the lift again.

CodieDev doesn't just measure speed. It creates it.

Measurement tells you where you stand. These features move you forward, automatically, without adding work for your engineers.

Skill engagement
411interactions

Skills that apply themselves.

Your team's best practices, captured once and applied automatically across everyone's work, so code comes out better-crafted the first time and needs fewer iterations. No effort required from the developer.

Async Coding Agent
PR ReadyWire OAuth callback into SessionProvider5h
PR ReadyAdd Zod schema for webhook payloads2d
MergedMigrate file edits to PATCH from PUT6d
MergedBackfill tests for billing controllers9d
PR ReadyAdd retry/backoff to queue consumer14d

An agent that clears the backlog.

The bugs, tests, and stale tickets that never get done, handled autonomously and pushed to PR, in volume. Your engineers stay focused on building features, not grinding through the boring queue.

Codie
Ask your team's memory
Every answer is grounded in your team's actual AI coding sessions, with citations.
Message Codie…

Institutional memory.

The patterns and hard-won lessons your team keeps rediscovering, surfaced from real work, so knowledge compounds instead of walking out the door.

We'll bridge the gap and certify your team.

Every engineering team is making the move to AI-driven development. If yours hasn't yet, the dashboards come later; first we build the capability. Our hands-on program gets your team productive with AI coding tools fast, and engineers earn certification by shipping real production code with AI, automatically verified. No quizzes, no theater. Then the platform takes over to sustain the momentum and measure the lift.

Engagement
Daily active developers
Distinct developers with an AI session each day: last 21 days.
21 days
Lightest 25% 1.1/day Most active 25% 5.4/day

Bring the same lens to the AI in your product.

If you're building AI features into what you sell, CodieDev's cost, optimization, and forecasting tools extend there too, so product and finance can see what those AI features cost, optimize the model mix, and calculate return.

Talk to us about product AI →